Letters CLI
|
Hey Mr Orange. This is A. Lemon writing to you from SW MO. I am 56 yo and have struggled with substance abuse issues since age 15. I have attached a copy of a letter I sent to the MO board of nursing last year in an attempt to get back my nursing license that I surrendered a few years ago. Currently I have been "sober" for 10 months using a methadone maintenance program that costs $400/mo. I use the pseudonym A. Lemon because I often feel that's what I am. A lemon. Defective. Damaged goods. I go to AA meetings but my sponsor let slip that I take methadone to his sponsor and I can't help but think the 'gurus' and aa over seers would appreciate my abcense. Thanks.
Hello Lemon, Thank you for the letter. I hope you are doing well with the methadone maintenance. I had not heard the term "radical addict" before, but your problem does seem to be extreme. It makes me feel like there are some people who are born with a deficiency in beta endorphines or dopamine, and they can't seem to ever feel right without a little "something"... I wish our society was a little more enlightened in dealing with such people. Obviously, your life could have been better if you had been given a steady supply of something by the State sooner. Good luck, and have a good life. And Merry Christmas. == Orange
* orange@orange-papers.info * * AA and Recovery Cult Debunking * * http://www.Orange-Papers.org/ * ** If you persist in making criminals out of ** alcoholics and addicts, you will find that ** you have lots and lots of criminals. ** == Orange ![]()
Dear Orange Thank you for your brilliant presentation. It's one of the clearest I've seen online. I'm trying to research how many of these characteristics are also in mainstream religion. I need to figure out if what is going on in my group ... well my group has quite a few of these characteristics, but the leader is a traditional monk who has been celibate for 60 years. So many people conclude that HE is authentic โ it's just the people working for him who are messing it up. Most of them are relatively new to it all & there is a high turnover of people who don't manage to keep celibacy. Anyway your site is helping. I'm wondering how much of the problems in my group are due to people simply being no good at being good. People try to be good but they make lot of mistakes & then mistaken ways of behaving start to be followed by more & more people. The leader always is very humble & giving people freedom but the people attempting to understand what he is doing say 'Oh how wonderful our leader is! We are having all these incredible experiences & everyone else could be having these incredible experiences too!' They then become very fanatical and start pushing everything, themselves, each other, and new people. People in senior positions get intense about doing a good job and if they come to a wrong conclusion a lot of people fawn over them and start saying we must follow this conclusion because it is from a senior teacher. Then often the teacher disrobes because they didn't manage to keep the celibacy vow (usually there was some transgression over a 10-20 year of ordination that gets exposed). So everyone except the leader is not managing to conduct themselves in a decent way. Because of this many people say 'I still regard the leader as my teacher but because of the behaviour of the rest I am abandoning the organisation.' So many people only go to the leaders teachings & see the senior students as people who will inevitably end up letting people down & make bad decisions. But now the leader is retiring and is asking us to care for the organisation once he is gone. So this info considered I don't know if I'm in a cult or not. The organisation admits to having some teething difficulties but the people running it are often stubborn and claiming the errors are in the past. Please let me know what you think. Regards Seekingpurity Hello Seekingpurity, Thanks for the letter. I hope you are doing well. Wow. I see a big problem. I'd get out of there fast. First off, a life of celebacy is not necessarily holy or enlightened. Enforced celebacy has created more problems than just about any other Church doctrine. And historically, the guy who pushed celebacy was Saul of Tarsus (who renamed himself "Paul"). Saul was a raving paranoid schizophrenic nutcase who went around killing Christians. And Paul just hated women, so he said that you should have nothing to do with them. Jesus never said that you should remain celebate. Look at what the doctrine of celebacy has done to the Catholic Church. For the last decade or more, it's one horror story after another of priests molesting and abusing children. Celebacy did not produce holiness; it produced perversion. Then there is the problem of "You are always wrong." In your group, you have people putting each other down, and finding faults in others, and denigrating themselves too, and nobody is really holy except for the leader... On the other hand, the leader is always right. That is bad. That just reeks of "cult". By the way, enforced celebacy is also an example of An Impossible Superhuman Model of Perfection. That is also good for guilt induction, and it sounds like a lot of people are getting denounced for not being superhumanly pure. That also just reeks of "cult". You know, that has to be a very unpleasant and depressing environment, with people constantly proclaiming that nobody is pure enough. And the constant guilt induction is harmful too. Why has the leader put together a group where everybody is wrong all of the time? What is wrong with his teachings? To blame all of the students all of the time, and say that they all fail, is the mark of a bad teacher. You described how the newcomers follow the teachings and guidance of the old-timers, even if the old-timers are wrong. That is the system of "mentoring", and it's another standard cult characteristic. I'm glad to hear that you are quitting the organization. Have a good day, and a good life, and Merry Christmas. == Orange
* orange@orange-papers.info * * AA and Recovery Cult Debunking * * http://www.Orange-Papers.org/ * ** The great artists of the world are never Puritans, ** and seldom even ordinarily respectable. ** == Henry Louis Mencken [1880โ1956], Prejudices, First Series, Chap. 16 ![]()
[The story of Carmen continues here.] ![]()
"Since i joined Alcoholics Anonymous i have always liked the Big Book
Study Recovery Meetings, You Meet a Better Class of Neurotics In them
"...................
p.s. The Big Book fundamentalists are as Nutty in Scotland as they are in the U.S.of A. I believe when they go to their 1st Big Book Study Meeting, the New Member has his or her Sense of Humour removed. They need to Relax & Laugh & Chill out. They are Very Serious and Uptight. Then you have to relate your Life to Bill's Story in Chapter 1, and if you can't do that, then you are not a "REAL" Alcoholic, what ever the Hell that means ......... Peace Be With Ya Bro
Hello KarmaSlayer, Thanks for the letter and news from the other side of the pond. Have a good day and a Merry Christmas. == Orange
* orange@orange-papers.info * * AA and Recovery Cult Debunking * * http://www.Orange-Papers.org/ * ** True wisdom is knowledge and humor combined. ![]()
I stay sober by having sex with women in the program. It's really great. It works for all of us! Well, have a good day anyway. C. Banana *When the winds of change are at rest...I can't make up a proverb. (Just kidding) I sent you an email about two weeks ago, and can see that you're very busy. I've been in touch with SMART Recovery, and plan on going to my first meeting. I've also become a part of their online forum. I'm glad that you've posted links to alternatives. When I brought up SMART to a guy in AA he sarcastically said, "Let me know how that works out for ya". There was no support or interest whatsoever. He just expressed doubt. It's AA or no way. "That's okay". Others might be more open to hearing about things that aren't AA related. The program can make me feel so suffocated sometimes. I think I'll just keep my opinions to myself. Once in awhile during meetings I've heard people speak of differing treatments, which is cool and surprising. It takes guts to utter such blasphemy at 'group level'. My first sponsor said that maybe AA wasn't for me, and he showed me other forms of support in our county. That was nice. Did I listen? Hell no. When I told my current sponsor about SMART he said, "Why would you want to start working another program? It might get you overwhelmed and confused". It was something to that effect. I don't think he's a proselytizing AA weirdo. He just cares about me. We've known each other for a few years. I just knew I could comfortably work with him. I'm going to try out SMART anyway. It's my life, right? Thanks again for the links. Hi Banana, Thanks for the letter, and thanks for the thanks. And I'm glad to hear that you are going to try SMART. I found it to be like a breath of fresh air after the "suffocating" feeling in A.A.
The thing that is sticking in my mind is,
That is classic F.U.D. โ plant Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt.
The SMART techniques are not overwhelming or confusing โ they are pretty
much common-sense logic, like, Not confusing at all. Good fortune with your recovery, and have a good day and a Merry Christmas. == Orange
* orange@orange-papers.info * * AA and Recovery Cult Debunking * * http://www.Orange-Papers.org/ * ** Be the proud captain still of thine own fate. ** == J. B. Kenyon [1858โ1924], A Challenge ![]()
Hi Orange, I don't know if you've read about this recently, but thought you may be interested... P.S., Longtime fan of your site and I hope that this is in some way a return on some of the great resources you've provided for me. Thanks for your time. Hi Matt, Thanks for the tip. So, alcoholism is not usually "a chronic, relapsing disease", and alcoholics can recover and become like "normal" people. And "the one-size-fits-all, abstinence-only approach preached by Alcoholics Anonymous is inconsisent with the evidence on drinking patterns." Finally, some words of sanity and common sense. I think it is especially important that a high-ranking official of the NIAAA said that โ Mark Willenbring, director of treatment and recovery research at the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. That is not just some ignorant bozo who can be ignored. Have a good day now, and Merry Christmas. == Orange
* orange@orange-papers.info * * AA and Recovery Cult Debunking * * http://www.Orange-Papers.org/ * ** "When a stupid man is doing something he is ashamed of, ** he always declares that it is his duty." ** == George Bernard Shaw (1856โ1950) ![]()
Orange you so damn funny! (Sincerely!) So, so sorry, I really couldn't resist. Probably not the first, probably not the last โ However all joking aside, I just discovered your website, and I must say that it is comprehensive, nay โ exhaustive! And, while also somewhat exhausting โ I've had to wade through more than a few repetitive rants โ you are definitely on a roll with the 12 steps translations. Very damn funny! Sincerely funny. Here's my story in brief: After several decades of being a rock'n'roll party girl, I realized that my drinking was out of hand, and probably had been for some time. While I do not consider myself an addict โ I do not drink everyday, or even every week, and I don't get rip roaring drunk every time I drink โ however, when I do get rip-roaring drunk (which I also wouldn't say was infrequent...) I sure can cause an awful lot of trouble for myself. On a more serious note, I had started blacking out from time to time, and this is obviously scary. One hung-over morning, I decided I should get some help, so I looked up the local A.A chapter and decided, on my own to attend a meeting. I found everyone at the meeting to be quite friendly and sincere, and I was also initially moved by the level of honesty (or so I thought) in the room. However, I also found myself totally dismayed by the language, not just in the literature, but the lingo that A.A.er's used in and out of meetings. The second meeting I attended, I raised some questions I had about the language, and one of the subsequent "sharer's" stated that "In A.A, we leave our brains at the door." Um, excuse me? And, "This is not an intellectual organization, it's 'spiritual' one." I thought to myself immediately that those statements smacked of fascism. However, after many encouragements to "take what I can and leave the rest for later" I decided to keep going. While attending A.A, I was told to avoid mouthwash, and when I asked why, I was told that " I may want to drink it. " When I asked why on earth would I want to do that, I was told "Well because it has alcohol in it." I immediately responded by saying, "Um, no disrespect, but if I want to drink, I live 2 blocks from the store, and I can afford beer." I have never, ever, been tempted in any way whatsoever to drink mouthwash. Whenever I raised any doubts, I was told, "Your best thinking got you here..." And I'd think, well, yes it did: I woke up with a nasty hangover one morning, decided I had a drinking problem, and thought to myself, gee, I should get some help." Seems to me my that my it was my best thinking that got me there, in a very un-ironic way. Needles to say, I think I "relapsed" (i.e, went to a party and drank too much) before I found out that I was pregnant, whereby I quit drinking, smoking, or doing any other recreational mind benders. I kept going to meetings during this time however. While I was pregnant, I would go to dances on the island where I lived. I always brought some near beer and had myself a jolly fine time dancing. When I told my A.A friend about going to party's sober and having a good time, she was very, very, judgmental. She even asked me if it was "O.K for the baby with all that dancing." Personally, I think that having the support of others who are trying to quit something that is harmful to them is very helpful. However, it is a shame that it has to be wrapped up in all this philosophical/religious dogma that I am that asked to swallow (more like, take little bites until I've eaten the whole Lamb of God.) In the last meeting I attended, I once again spoke about being agnostic/atheist, and spoke about my misgivings with the language. I kept getting told to "take what I can..." Which, is not very much at all, and if I have to constantly change the language in my mind so that I can "work" this program, maybe the program doesn't work for me. Also, at the end of the meeting, no less than 3 people attempted to debate what they called my "So called Agnosticism" and convince me of the existence of "God." Further more, there was something about this meeting that truly disturbed me. This meeting was held in a church on a Salish Indian reserve, and there where two native women present. One of the women was obviously high, but she rambled on about not being able to "understand this program, but that she was going to keep trying," and then she'd rant about the abuse that her people suffered under the residential school system, as well as her own physical and sexual abuse. She also talked a great deal about how all the buffalo were gone. So in case your mind didn't go where mine did immediately while witnessing this: What a tragic Irony. Here is a native woman, sitting in the basement of a Christian Church, what you might call the very symbol of her people's oppression, trying to understand a recovery program created by white, Christian men โ and she chastised herself for her failing to understand it. I have never been to another meeting. Thanks, I just wanted to tell that story. Sincerely, G-force. Hello G-force, Thank you for the letter and the stories, and the compliments. Your letter says it all, so I can't think of anything to add. Have a good day and a Merry Christmas. == Orange P.S.: But I just have to add this: I trust that you are healthy and doing okay. And your child too.
I agree about the standard condescending A.A. put-down, "Your best thinking got you here." Have a good day now. == Orange
* orange@orange-papers.info * * AA and Recovery Cult Debunking * * http://www.Orange-Papers.org/ * ** "These are people who know God's will far better than God." ** == Jan Baer, Lost in translation ![]()
Hi Orange, I like your site and really have no beef either way. For me, the program works and I'm grateful. I'm sure I could have found other ways but I use AA and it works. I, like you do not agree that our court system should impose anyone to propation tied with going to AA meetings. It wrong for a lot of reasons but no one should be mandated to attend meetings. It's bad for AA as well. I personally will sign anyones court cards before the meeting and they are free to leave. The program has no chance if they don't want to be there in the first place. Here is something I wrote. Maybe if you have time, give it a read and let me know what you think.
Hello D.C.M., Well, starting at the top, the World War II analogy is inaccurate. The truth is more like this:
One hundred soldiers stumble into a mine field. They find out that they are in a mine field when guys start getting blown up. Some soldiers immediately panic and run around crazy. Other cooler heads turn around and back out fast and are gone. Of those who are running around crazy in the field, most get blown up. Some more wander out alive. Alcoholics Anonymous does not have "a path of recovery". It is just a recycled old cult religion. A.A. totally fails to make alcoholics get sober and stay sober. The few sober people that you see in an A.A. meeting are just the five out of a hundred who didn't get "blown up". When the actual results of A.A. involvement were carefully measured in proper clinical studies, A.A. raised the rate of binge drinking, and raised the rate of rearrests for drunkenness, and raised the death rate of alcoholics. Have a good day, and a Merry Christmas. == Orange
* orange@orange-papers.info * * AA and Recovery Cult Debunking * * http://www.Orange-Papers.org/ * ** "Most folks are about as happy as they ** make up their minds to be." ** == Abraham Lincoln. ![]()
Mr. Agent Orange, 1. pardon my Ignorance but what Is It you sand for? Hi Tony, I stand for telling the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. 2. Its obvious to me you are against bill wilson am I wrong In this assumption? I am against ALL lying, thieving cult leaders, including Bill Wilson. 3. do you always point out the flaws In others who disagree with you? No, not always. 4. are you not demonstrating the same character flaws you are so quick to point out In others? No. I don't lie to people and sell them cult religion as a quack cure for a deadly illness. I also don't take from $7000 to $40,000 from sick people for a fake cure. 5. are you not rationalizing your own point of view while calling bill wilson a rationalizer No. 6. Is agent orange a cult? How can one person be a cult? A cult is a group of people. 7. why do you accept donations? Because running a web site like this isn't free, and I'm not rich. (Notice that A.A. passes the hat or basket at meetings for the very same reason, and I have never criticized A.A. for that.) 8. who do you give an accounting to for money you receive? Nobody. 9. have you ever spent donations on personal vacations, real estate, automobiles, prostitution, etc.? No. (I don't have any of those things. They are expensive, and the web site doesn't quite break even, so there are no millions for palaces on the French Riviera with pretty French prostitutes.) 10. are you aware that bill Wilson Is dead and no one thinks bill wilson Is God except you? I never said that Bill Wilson is God. That's crazy. And yes, I am aware that he is dead. Unfortunately, the evil that he did during his life lives on. 11. Is It possible you are as crazy as you claim bill wilson was? No. Sorry, but I'm just not that crazy. Or heartless, or exploitative. 12. do you believe in God or Love? Yes.
best regards You have a good day and a Merry Christmas too, Tony. == Orange
* orange@orange-papers.info * * AA and Recovery Cult Debunking * * http://www.Orange-Papers.org/ * ** "The evil that men do lives after them; ** The good is oft' interred with their bones." ** == William Shakespeare, Julius Caesar ![]()
Mr. Orange, Love your site. My Dad is at least a 15 year vet of AA. Quit talking to him in 2004. Gave him an ultimatum, me or the cult, he chose the cult. My parents divorced when I was 3 and he blew me off, so no big loss. He wants everyone to kiss his behind for doing nothing, for being sober. We are supposed to feel sorry for him because he is handicapped with the self-inflicted drinking "disease". If it is an "affliction" he is not responsible. What a neat system for him, give him credit when he is sober, and sympathy when he "relapses". With the unsolvable problem of continual "recovery", he is excused from having to be a parent or anything else. Great study of the multifaceted nonsense that is AA. swc Hi Scott, Thanks for the letter and the compliments. You aren't doing a bad job of telling the truth either. Have a good day. == Orange
* orange@orange-papers.info * * AA and Recovery Cult Debunking * * http://www.Orange-Papers.org/ * ** To every thing there is a season, ** and a time to every purpose under heaven. ** A time to be born, and a time to die. ** A time to weep, and a time to laugh; ** a time to mourn, and a time to dance. ** A time to keep silence, and a time to speak. ** == Ecclesiastes III, 1-7 ![]()
Dear Orange, Do you use any measures other than picking-up 1,5,10 etc. yr coins for AA success ? My last drink was Sep 1984 and I've never picked-up a coin for an anniversary. I'm sure there are several others like myself that don't get into the coin thing. Thanks Jim Hi Jim, I use every source of data that I can get, and I am always looking for more. Here are several of them:
So, do you have some data to add to the library? Any official reports or spreadsheets or statistics? I'd appreciate any more valid data that I can get. By the way, if you and your friends don't "do the coin thing", then you won't change the dropout rate at all. You just don't get counted one way or the other. Have a good day and a Merry Christmas. == Orange
* orange@orange-papers.info * * AA and Recovery Cult Debunking * * http://www.Orange-Papers.org/ * ** The way to love everything is to realize that it ** might be lost. ![]()
Last updated 12 July 2014. |


